Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Global Social Policy
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gough, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Globalization and Regional Welfare Regimes

The East Asian Case

Ian Gough

University of Bath, UK

This article contributes to the ongoing debate about the impact of globalization on welfare systems across the world. Its argument is that economic globalization alters the global balance of forces compared with the ‘Golden Age’ of welfare capitalism, but that its impact on policies and outcomes is decisively mediated by national and regional ‘welfare regimes'. This argument has been developed in relation to the advanced capitalist countries of the north, but is rarely applied to the south. This article applies the argument to the south through a case study of five economically successful countries in East Asia: Korea, Malaysia, Thailand, the Philippines and Indonesia. It depicts and analyses their welfare regimes using a new conceptual framework developed at the University of Bath. It then considers the impact of the Asian financial crisis as an example of the new risks faced by exposed countries in the global economy. The conclusion is that, despite common, sudden and decisive macroeconomic problems, the social policy reactions have differed across the five countries, in part reflecting variations in their welfare regimes.

Key Words: East Asia • globalization • social policy • welfare regime

Global Social Policy, Vol. 1, No. 2, 163-189 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/146801810100100202


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Global Social PolicyHome page
S. Cook and H.-J. Kwon
Social Protection in East Asia
Global Social Policy, August 1, 2007; 7(2): 223 - 229.
[PDF]


Home page
Global Social PolicyHome page
I. Gough
Human Well-Being and Social Structures: Relating the Universal and the Local
Global Social Policy, December 1, 2004; 4(3): 289 - 311.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Global Social PolicyHome page
P. Stubbs
International Non-State Actors and Social Development Policy
Global Social Policy, December 1, 2003; 3(3): 319 - 348.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Economic and Industrial DemocracyHome page
A. H.K. Son
The Extension of Entitlement to Health Insurance in South Korea and Taiwan A Historical Institutional Approach
Economic and Industrial Democracy, August 1, 2003; 24(3): 455 - 478.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of European Social PolicyHome page
L. Leisering
Nation State and Welfare State: An Intellectual and Political History
Journal of European Social Policy, May 1, 2003; 13(2): 175 - 185.
[PDF]